Golden Heard Promised Millions Of Dollars Of Her Divorce Settlement To The ACLU, But It’s Only Received Less Than Half That

Golden Heard Promised Millions Of Dollars Of Her Divorce Settlement To The ACLU, But It’s Only Received Less Than Half That

Golden Heard’s ex Elon Musk might have made piece of the gift, the ACLU accepts.

In the wake of promising to give half of her $7 million separation settlement to the American Civil Liberties Union in 2016, Amber Heard by and by gave and set up for others to give not exactly 50% of that, an authority with the association said Thursday.

Terence Dougherty, the ACLU’s head working official, expressed promises of gifts regularly don’t come at the same time and that Heard never consented to a timetable of installments.

“We connected with Heard beginning in 2019 for the following portion of her giving, and we discovered that she was having monetary hardships,” Dougherty said.

Dougherty said Heard gave $350,000 to the ACLU “very soon” after August 2016, when she said in an explanation that she would give half of the separation settlement to the ACLU and the other half to Children’s Hospital Los Angeles. Sooner or later, her ex Johnny Depp gave $100,000 to the ACLU for her sake. What’s more, one more $500,000 and $350,000 were given for Heard’s sake, carrying the complete to $1.3 million gave out of the $3.5 million guaranteed. Dougherty said he accepts the $500,000 gift came from a benefactor exhorted reserve set up by Elon Musk, Heard’s previous sweetheart, yet that is “not definitive,” he said.

The examination of Heard’s giving comes as preliminary is in progress in the $50 million slander claim Depp recorded against her. Depp has asserted that a 2018 opinion piece in which Heard depicted herself as a survivor of aggressive behavior at home erroneously suggested that he had manhandled her, costing him film jobs and different open doors. Lawyers for Heard have said that she was actually and physically mishandled by Depp, frequently when he was drinking or utilizing drugs, and the opinion piece fell inside her entitlement to free discourse.

While planning for the ongoing slander preliminary, Depp sued the ACLU to decide if Heard had given the cash she swore. In August 2021, a New York judge conceded Depp and his lawful group consent to confirm that.

The opinion piece being referred to emerged from Heard’s relationship with the ACLU, which named her a minister in October 2018. The gathering helped Heard compose and put the piece in the Washington Post, and messages show that distribution was intended to be around the very time that her film Aquaman was delivered.

The opinion piece at first referenced Heard’s relationship with Depp, Dougherty affirmed, yet any notice was sliced to safeguard Heard from breaking the nondisclosure arrangement she endorsed with Depp as a feature of settling their separation.

“The language that injury up in the last commentary piece was totally different from the first language that Robin [Shulman, an ACLU interchanges strategist] remembered for the commentary subsequent to having spoken with Amber about her own encounters,” Dougherty said during his December affidavit, which was played in court Thursday. He explained that the last language was different in light of the fact that “it didn’t allude straightforwardly to Ms. Heard’s relationship with Johnny Depp.”